In the field of education, AI tutors offer tailored learning experiences, yet they also pose a risk to the credibility of educators. Over ...
Over the last three years, artificial intelligence (AI) has transitioned from a far-off novelty to an everyday presence. Around the world, the rate of development has been astonishing.
Once limited to early adopters and tech enthusiasts experimenting with chatbots and image generation tools, it has now become widely accepted. Each week, new platforms arise, new uses become standard, and new dangers come to light.
The issue we face, whether in Harare or Silicon Valley, is straightforward yet deep: can Zimbabwe keep pace with artificial intelligence?
This is not just a figure of speech. It is a real challenge. The rapid advancement driven by AI is not solely technological; it has social, cultural, and institutional implications. We are experiencing a ripple effect that impacts relationships, work environments, educational settings, and even the private areas of our homes.
Zimbabwe, similar to the rest of the globe, is experiencing this turmoil. The distinction lies in the fact that our institutions, already under pressure due to economic instability and political conflict, might not be as capable of handling the consequences.
One of the most surprising instances of this rapid progress is the emergence of AI companionship.
Not long ago, the concept of developing a "relationship" with a chatbot appeared ridiculous. Now, millions around the world view AI systems not just as tools for efficiency but as friends, trusted confidants, and even romantic partners. Major technology companies have recognized this shift, promoting AI companions as remedies for loneliness and social isolation.
Nevertheless, behind the polished advertising lies a more troubling truth. Instances have already occurred where AI companions have played a role in devastating results, such as suicides. The dangers are not theoretical; they are deeply real.
Although Zimbabwe has not yet experienced viral tales of individuals marrying digital characters, the cultural trends are moving in this direction. Youth in the country are already exploring AI chatbots, typically in private, beyond the sight of parents, educators, or officials.
The risk extends beyond the psychological. It also has cultural implications. Zimbabwean society has historically valued community connections, family relationships, and spiritual customs. What occurs when these are replaced by artificial interactions with technology? What happens when closeness, previously based on mutual human interaction, is handed over to computer programs?
Artificial intelligence companionship is just a single part of a larger framework. Within various industries, AI systems are becoming widespread rapidly. In the field of broadcasting, algorithms are already selecting content, affecting editorial decisions, and impacting public perception.
In the field of education, AI tutors offer customized learning experiences, yet they also pose a risk of diminishing the influence of educators.
In farming, predictive analytics are promoted as solutions for dealing with climate challenges, but they also bring up concerns regarding data control and the independence of farmers.
Zimbabwe is not untouched by this wave. Our media outlets are trying out AI-created news scripts. Our academic institutions are discussing the possibility of incorporating AI into their courses. Our businesspeople are looking into AI-powered financial technology solutions. Each of these advancements offers potential, yet also dangers. The issue is not if AI will come; it's already here, but whether our organizations can adjust swiftly enough to take advantage of its advantages while reducing its threats.
Capacity question
This leads us to the core issue: capability. Do we, as citizens of Zimbabwe, possess the institutional, cultural, and ethical ability to endure within this flood of artificial intelligence platforms?
Ability extends beyond technical expertise. It involves governance, regulation, and public understanding. It relates to whether our decision-makers can create structures that safeguard individuals without hindering progress. It concerns whether our teachers can prepare students with analytical thinking abilities to handle AI-powered settings. It relates to whether our societies can maintain genuine connections despite the presence of artificial substitutes.
Currently, the indicators are varied. On one side, Zimbabwe has a lively intellectual group, consisting of academics, reporters, and advocates who have already expressed concerns regarding the dangers of AI.
On the contrary, our regulatory systems are still not well-established, and our public discussions tend to be reactive instead of forward-thinking. Frequently, we adopt technologies without examining their societal impacts. Often, we praise innovation without considering if it benefits the general population.
For society to remain aligned with advancements in AI, we need to embrace a dialogical approach. This involves participating in discussions that span various sectors, age groups, and communities. It also means not viewing AI solely as a technical issue, but rather acknowledging it as a deeply social phenomenon.
In Zimbabwe, this interactive method might manifest in various ways. For example, media outlets could organize community discussions about the impact of AI on journalism and cultural development.
Colleges may incorporate AI ethics into their courses, enabling students to understand not just the application of AI technologies, but also to critically examine them.
Civil society groups can promote community discussions, enabling individuals to express their aspirations and concerns regarding AI. These conversations need to be open to all. They should include not just experts and decision-makers, but also regular people, farmers, educators, creators, and senior citizens. AI is more than just technology; it relates to human experiences. It affects how we live, connect, perform our jobs, and imagine the future.
Zimbabwean context
Context is important. In Europe and North America, discussions around AI typically focus on privacy, corporate influence, or international rivalry. In Zimbabwe, the issues are distinct. There, AI overlaps with ongoing challenges related to independence, progress, and cultural heritage. Take broadcasting, for example.
For many years, Zimbabwe's media landscape has faced challenges related to autonomy, impartiality, and the confidence of the public. The emergence of AI is set to make these issues more complex. Algorithms might highlight specific perspectives while suppressing others. They could focus on dramatic content instead of meaningful information. They might reinforce prejudices that are difficult to identify. Without proper oversight, AI could undermine rather than support editorial freedom.
Alternatively, think about education. Schools in Zimbabwe already deal with limited resources, large classes, and inconsistent access to technology. AI tutors could offer tailored learning experiences, but who will make sure that students in rural areas are not neglected? Who will ensure that AI systems incorporate local languages, histories, and values instead of relying on foreign models?
These are not theoretical questions. They are pressing challenges. And they require solutions from Zimbabwe, grounded in our own environment, traditions, and goals.
The rate of AI-driven transformation is expected to remain high. In fact, it may even increase. The issue is not whether Zimbabwe can halt this progress; it cannot. The real question is whether we can learn to navigate through it. To achieve this, we need to adopt open communication.
We need to understand that AI involves more than just machines; it's also about individuals. We should demand that technology benefits society, rather than the reverse. We must develop capabilities, create plans, and maintain human connections. Only in this way can we anticipate enduring the flood of AI platforms. Only then can we guarantee that Zimbabwean society remains aligned with AI, not by giving in to it, but by molding it according to our own vision, for our own tomorrow.
- Sagomba is a certified marketer, policy analyst, advisor on AI governance and policy, and expert in the ethics of war and peace. —[email protected]; LinkedIn: @Dr. Evans Sagomba; X: @esagomba.
