If people take legal steps against social media influencers due to false information, risky actions, or improper conduct, it's an indica...
If people take legal steps against social media influencers due to false information, risky actions, or improper conduct, it's an indication that measures should be considered to limit such activities on the internet.
A series of recent controversies highlights that the uncontrolled growth of influencers who profit from sensational or unsupported content has turned into a serious issue, as their impact can cause actual damage to individuals and sectors.
The first case centers around content creator Jaturong Papho, also recognized as Jack Papho. Having amassed a massive following on Facebook and TikTok, Jack Papho faced intense criticism after sharing a video of himself dancing without a shirt on the roof of a vehicle in front of a Lawson convenience store in Japan, with Mount Fuji visible in the background.
This specific convenience store branch has gained notoriety due to incidents involving tourist misconduct. At one time, local officials placed a black screen at the site to prevent views of Mount Fuji and deter tourists who had angered residents with their poor conduct, such as jaywalking, littering, disregarding traffic rules, and climbing on rooftops and traffic signs to get better photo opportunities.
Jack Papho's video, titled "They may look down on me, but I don't care," triggered criticism from both Thai and Japanese online users. Reactions included warnings to the YouTuber to show respect for local traditions, as well as expressions of disapproval that such actions have embarrassed Thailand.
The dispute intensified to the extent that certain social media users demanded the Thai embassy in Tokyo to cancel Jack Papho's passport. Even Foreign Minister Sihasak Phuangketkeow and Tourism and Sports Minister Atthakorn Sirilatthayakorn got involved, encouraging Thai tourists to abide by the laws and cultural traditions of the nations they travel to.
The second controversy involves false information. An online discussion platform organized by media figure Wuthithorn "Woody" Milintajinda included panelists, such as influencers, who claimed that Thai cow milk was of lower quality compared to imported alternatives.
The allegation prompted Thai dairy farmers, specialists, and the Minister of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Capt Thamanat Prompow, to defend the quality of local milk, assuring the public that Thai cow's milk is safe, clean, and complies with global nutritional requirements. Woody later issued a apology, stating that the information shared on the show was incomplete and incorrect.
Finally, young doctor and TikTok personality Dr. Mook has sparked debates regarding professional ethics. Famous for her videos featuring indulging in cake, the content creator found herself in a controversy after posting a clip that criticized an employee at a popular clothing brand.
The conflict led online users to doubt if her previous "reviews" of products and services were just to business owners. Additionally, is it suitable for a physician to advocate a habit of overindulgence by frequently consuming items such as thick whipped cream and pastries?
One certainty exists. When content creators are allowed to bypass regulations, display extreme conduct, or disseminate lies to gain more attention, their title of "influencers" becomes inaccurate.
This is a matter that requires all involved parties, including regulatory bodies, brands, and the online community, to take every possible action to ensure creators comply with legal standards, cultural awareness, and journalistic ethics.
Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc.Syndigate.info).
